The way to choose employees

How do the business employers judge the qualifications of potential employees? One

kind of view is that “When judging the qualifications of potential employees, business

employers should rely solely on objective information. Personal interviews are much

too subjective and are therefore not a valid basis on which to judge a person’s

qualifications for a job.”

However is it totally true? What is the most reasonable way

to choose people the enterprise want? Here are my opinions.

First of all, we have to realize that enterprise recruits staff can't simply read resume or

face-to- face communication. Enterprise can not only look at resume, but also by the

interview. Enterprise only clearly understands who you are and what you lack of and

then you can find the employees for their development of business. The test in an

interview is an essential important link.

Recruitment testing generally should be divided into interview, knowledge

examination, psychological testing, operation technology assessment and

qualifications review. Interview is the most common method in recruitment activities.

According to an interview form and purpose, interview can be divided into many

types. Such as structural interview, unstructured interview, general interview,

professional skills interview, etc.

Interview has many advantages, such as strong

adaptability, can two-way communication, can multi-channel to get candidate's

information. The great drawback to interview is not easy quantification and there may

be various prejudices.

Knowledge test is another common method in recruitment activities. Knowledge

examination refers to through the paper and pencil tests of the candidates in the form

of knowledge breadth, depth of knowledge and understanding of the knowledge

structure of a way.

The purpose of a test is mainly about knowing the width of the

candidate's knowledge, the extent of the candidate of professional knowledge and

application level.

There is a misconception that qualifications equal to the ability society are wearing

tinted glasses for this. From a recruitment perspective, basically large enterprises to

recruit staff as sales people first are a college education. Education is a stepping stone,

no diploma the interviewer is seeing you, let alone gives you the opportunity.

Most people basically thought pattern is that it looks like: qualifications equal to

knowledge, knowledge is equal to capacity, no qualifications equal to no knowledge,

no ability.

Degree does not necessarily have the knowledge, there is no academic qualifications

may not necessarily illiterate, the key only to personal learning and efforts.

Higher education can only prove one o'clock-the person subjected to formal education,

systematic learning conditions and a good learning environment. But this man how

much knowledge learned in school is not a degree proves that academic achievement

also has good and bad points.

Edison didn't finish even primary schools, who would dare to say that Edison has no

culture, no knowledge? Mao attended the University, but to comment on China's first

great man of the century who can match. Bill Gates didn't finish college, but no one

（五）